Evolution of Language Representation Techniques: A Journey from BoW to GPT

Language Representation and Vectorization Techniques in NLP.

Evolution of Language Representation.

Introduction

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is at the core of numerous AI applications, from language translation and sentiment analysis to chatbots and search engines. However, to perform meaningful tasks, machines need a way to understand and process human language. Here, language representation and vectorization techniques play a crucial role, transforming textual data into a format that can be processed by machine learning algorithms.

This article will delve into what language representation and vectorization techniques are, explore various types of language representations, explain embeddings, and break down key differences between popular approaches like Word2Vec, BERT, and GPT.

1. What is a Language Representation and Vectorization Technique?

In NLP, language representation and vectorization refer to methods of converting words, sentences, or entire documents into numerical vectors. Since machine learning models require numerical data to function, these techniques help transform text data into vectors while preserving semantic meaning.

Why is this important?

Language representation enables machines to capture context, relationships, and patterns between words, which is crucial for tasks like machine translation and information retrieval. Vectorization makes this data compatible with ML models, allowing them to process language more effectively.

2. Different Types of Language Representations

Over time, NLP has evolved through different representation techniques, each improving upon the limitations of previous methods. Let’s look at the main types:

a) One-Hot Encoding

One-hot encoding is one of the earliest forms of text vectorization. Each word is represented by a vector of 0s and a single 1, indicating its presence in a vocabulary.

• Advantages: Simple and easy to implement.
• Limitations: No notion of similarity between words. A huge vocabulary creates sparse and inefficient vectors.

b) Bag of Words (BoW)

The Bag of Words model represents text as an unordered collection of words, where each word’s frequency is counted. While BoW is straightforward and easy to implement, it has significant limitations:

BOW Model Hierarchy.

• Loss of Context: BoW ignores the order of words, which can lead to a loss of meaning.
• High Dimensionality: The vocabulary size can lead to high-dimensional feature spaces, making computations expensive.
• Sparsity: Most documents contain only a small subset of the vocabulary, resulting in sparse representations.

Pros & Cons

Despite these drawbacks, BoW was a foundational step in text classification and information retrieval.

c) TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency)

TF-IDF improves upon BoW by considering the frequency of words in a document relative to their appearance across all documents. It helps identify keywords by weighing down commonly occurring words and giving more weight to rare, important words.

TF-IDF Model Hierarchy

• Advantages: More meaningful representation than BoW for document-level analysis.
• Limitations: Still does not capture word context and relationships between words.

Limitation BOW & TF-IDF Models

d) Word Embeddings

Word embeddings (like Word2Vec) represent words as dense vectors that encode semantic meaning. Unlike previous techniques, embeddings position similar words close to each other in vector space.

Word Embedding Techniques Hierarchy.

• Advantages: Captures word semantics and similarity effectively.
• Limitations: Needs a large corpus to learn meaningful embeddings.

Pros & Cons

e) Contextual Embeddings

Contextual word Representation Hierarchy.

Contextual embeddings (e.g., BERT, GPT) are the latest advancement, where word representations vary depending on the context. For example, “bank” in “river bank” and “bank account” would be represented differently.

Word Representation.

• Advantages: Captures contextual meaning effectively, allowing models to understand polysemy.
• Limitations: Computationally intensive and requires large datasets.

Pros & Cons

3. What is an Embedding?

An embedding is a dense, low-dimensional vector that represents words, phrases, or documents in a continuous vector space. Unlike traditional representations (e.g., one-hot encoding), embeddings capture semantic relationships between words. Words that are similar in meaning are represented by vectors that are close together in this space.

Embeddings are typically learned using neural network-based models that process a large corpus of text and map words into a vector space where relationships are encoded. For example:

• Word2Vec: Embeddings capture semantic similarity (e.g., “king” — “man” + “woman” ≈ “queen”).
• Contextual Embeddings (like BERT): Embeddings differ for each occurrence of a word depending on its surrounding context.

4. Differences between Word2Vec, BERT, and GPT

Each of these techniques has advanced NLP in unique ways, pushing the boundaries of language understanding in AI. Let’s break down their key differences:

a) Word2Vec

• Description: Developed by Google in 2013, Word2Vec learns word representations through two main methods, CBOW (Continuous Bag of Words) and Skip-Gram. Both methods rely on the surrounding words to predict a target word or vice versa, capturing relationships based on proximity.
• Strengths: Effective at capturing semantic relationships (e.g., “king” — “man” + “woman” = “queen”).
• Limitations: Generates a single, context-independent embedding for each word. Lacks depth in polysemy handling (words with multiple meanings).
• Application: Used in simpler NLP tasks like document clustering, topic modeling, and keyword extraction.

b) BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)

• Description: Created by Google in 2018, BERT uses a transformer-based architecture that reads text bidirectionally, meaning it considers both left and right context simultaneously. BERT learns embeddings by predicting masked words within a sentence, effectively modeling context.
• Strengths: Excellent at capturing context, especially for polysemous words (words with multiple meanings) in sentences.
• Limitations: Computationally expensive; BERT embeddings are not easily transferable to other tasks without fine-tuning.
• Application: Widely used in question answering, named entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and more.

c) GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer)

• Description: GPT, developed by OpenAI, is an autoregressive transformer model that generates text based on a given input prompt. Unlike BERT, which is bidirectional, GPT processes text in a unidirectional (left-to-right) manner, using each previous word to predict the next.
• Strengths: Excels at text generation tasks due to its sequential modeling approach.
• Limitations: Unidirectional nature can be limiting for certain comprehension tasks.
• Application: Commonly used in text generation, translation, summarization, and dialogue generation.

Conclusion

References :

1. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.

• This paper introduces Word2Vec, explaining the continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) and skip-gram models for word embeddings.
• Link to Paper

2. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., … & Polosukhin, I. (2017). “Attention is All You Need.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 30.

• This foundational paper introduces the Transformer architecture, which is the basis for models like BERT and GPT.
• Link to Paper

3. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.

• This paper presents BERT, a bidirectional transformer model that has significantly advanced NLP.
• Link to Paper

4. Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). “Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training.” OpenAI.

• This paper introduces GPT, the generative pre-trained transformer, which focuses on unidirectional text generation and has led to the development of advanced language models like GPT-2 and GPT-3.
• Link to Paper

Appreciation :

Grateful to Innomatics Research Labs for providing this opportunity to expand my knowledge and explore new technologies.

— — — — — — — — — -Thank You! — — — — — — — — —

Thank you for taking the time to read my article. I hope you found it useful and informative. Your support means a lot, and I appreciate you joining me on this journey of exploration and learning. If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out!

— — — — — — — — — Contact — — — — — — — — — — —

Linkdein -https://www.linkedin.com/in/md-tahseen-equbal-/
Github -https://github.com/Md-Tahseen-Equbal
Kaggle- https://www.kaggle.com/mdtahseenequbal